Computers

September 30, 2008

Try Google Search As It Was in 2001

Filed under: Technology, Internet, Google, Search — Lindon @ 9:01 pm

In honor of their tenth birthday*, Google brought back their search engine the way it was many years ago, in January 2001. Below an old-school Google logo (in 2001 they were actually already using a newer one) the input box invites you to search through “1,326,920,000 web pages”. A search for Barack Obama returns around 773 results, for instance, with the top link leading to the old address as it was, and a special link pointing to the Wayback Machine’s archived version of it (today, over 60 million results are returned). A search for Gmail returns “gmail.linuxpower.org”, a Linux “email client for the Gnome desktop”. A search for BitTorrent returns 0 results.

Now, why isn’t Google showing the index of 1998, considering it’s supposed to celebrate their 10th birthday? “[F]or various technical reasons that are too boring to go into,” Google states in their FAQ, “earlier versions of our index aren’t readily accessible ... the January 2001 index is the best we can do.” Google’s FAQ also disclaims that the index shown is not exactly the one as it was in 2001, but that it’s a “pretty good” approximation. The FAQ adds that this special search engine won’t be live forever, but just for one month.

Google 2001 is a highly interesting trip to the past. You can get a feeling for what the web** was like back then, what topics were as of yet unknown or little talked about, and – provided the ranking order is the exact same as it was in 2001, which I’m not entirely sure about – you can also evaluate how well Google ranked results back then. Which insightful bits did you find?

*Or one of their tenth birthdays, as there’s different dates where you might want to put the “start” flag.

**The web, or to be more precise, Google’s large but incomplete index of it.

[By Philipp Lenssen | Origin: Try Google Search As It Was in 2001 | Comments]


[Advertisement] Find the right keywords for your campaigns at KeywordDiscovery.com

The Emergence of Crimeware as a Service (CaaS)

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindon @ 7:41 pm

As the malware threat landscape continues to evolve, hackers are constantly changing techniques to counteract detection technologies vendors develop. By using sophisticated methods to evade antivirus technologies, hackers continue to be relentless in their pursuit of damaging IT systems and gaining access to personal information.

In the past, hackers used polymorphism and metamorphism as tactics to constantly generate new variants of worms. Essentially, through polymorphism, the virus would morph itself into different variations to bypass signature-based technologies. The antivirus industry eventually responded to polymorphism by creating emulation technologies to counteract this new breed of virus. Emulation engines were designed to mimic the properties of the morphed virus so it could be detected by other means (signature and heuristics). This approach was dependent on the researcher's access to the polymorphic engine -- meaning the logic had to be decoded before you could develop protection for specific mutations.

Hackers are shifting their interests from fame (among shady peers) to profit and go after financial gain by developing new and innovative ways to slip below the radar. Some of these methods are innovative and are evidence of thinking out of the box when it comes to crime. Hence the development of custom HTML injection by Banker Torjans, for example, to obtain protected information.

As we begin to map the evolution of malware, there are several themes using stealth and camouflage techniques, including:

  • Custom run-time packers (compression)
  • Server-side polymorphism

A major risk to security is the emergence of server-side polymorphism or “Crimeware as a Service (CaaS)”, in which the polymorphic engine does not reside within the virus code itself, but rather remotely on a server. There are two forms of server-side polymorphism that we know of today: the type that distributes mutated variations of malware into the wild in volume; and PCs that are part of a botnet -- a specific bot variant can mutate remotely via a command over HTTP. This is called crimeware as a service because the actual viral code does not actually reside on the host, but in the cloud -- similar to a software-as-a-service platform. In other words, CaaS provides malware on demand to the infected host.

For the complete article written by myself please see the posting at SC Magazine online.

So what’s all this talk of Clickjacking?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Lindon @ 5:30 pm

So there has been a lot of talk recently about this new cross-browser vulnerability known as “Clickjacking”, but what is the potential impact of such a vulnerability to users abroad?

Well essentially the exploit allows a hacker to take control of the links that your browser visits and thus if you come in contact with a malicious site or site that is tainted with malicious code (either through spam, some site tainted by a SQL injection, etc), it then gives the hackers the ability to ‘capture’ your clicks and thus trick you into clicking on links you may have not intended on clicking. At this time technical details are a little sketchy in terms of information regarding specific exploit code, but some information is available here and here. 

One could only guess what could happen next once you are forced to click on a link such as installation of a Banker Trojan or other malware is certaintly a possibility

The Google Story, Updated for Google’s 10th Birthday

Filed under: Technology, Internet, Google, Search — Lindon @ 11:23 am

Between Google’s 10th birthday, the third Google founder controversy, ordering your G1 and their launch of “10 to the 100th"*, you might have missed the new “Google Story”. This latest iteration of David Vise and Mark Malseed’s National Bestseller hit store shelves last Tuesday**. “Updated for Google’s 10th Birthday”, this new edition is the same “Google Story” you’ve come to know only updated with new accounts. Like previous versions, this latest edition provides an interesting and entertaining glimpse behind the curtain at Google. It’s a great read for anyone interested in learning more about Google’s greatest successes and biggest blunders from a unique, behind the scenes perspective.

The Preface provides insight into the lives of Google’s founders and how they have changed over the past ten years. From bachelors living on credit in Stanford’s dorms to married billionaires ranked among the top five wealthiest Americans, it’s a pretty remarkable story.

In terms of new information and updated statistics, the book claims that Google now has more than 20,000 employees, a million computers and produces “billions of search results with every tick of the clock”. Most of the new information is introduced around page 260. In addition to the new Preface, up to date information, expanded chapter and the addition of one new chapter, readers may notice a few things are missing from this addition edition. Interestingly, the chapter titled “Trick Clicks” about click fraud is no longer a part of “The Google Story”. Also missing, a recount of Eric Schmidt’s run-in with CNET over their publishing his personal information found via Google.***

What’s good about the book?

  • The recounts in this book are fantastic! One of my favorites is the time Mikhail Gorbachev and Shimon Peres dropped in to hear Brin and Page while speaking at a Israeli high school.
  • Obviously, I’ve always thought Blogoscoped’s role in “The Google Story” was an interesting one but, no updates there until next time (Chrome) I guess!
  • I don’t want to give away anything but, this edition serves up lots of “juicy” details regarding Google’s move into China and the role Dr. Kai-Fu Lee played. Google CEO Eric Schmidt is quoted as saying “We actually did an ’evil scale’” in determining Google’s approach in China.
  • It’s pretty amazing but according to the book, “Larry and Sergey still look at all measurements for all traffic for all applications every week”.
  • Despite the free food, bean bags and lava lamps, according to Sergey Brin “... what is not apparent from the outside is the set of rigorous systems and processes that we use to manage our growth while maintaining this entrepreneurial zeal.”
  • Detailed updates also include Appendix #9 and #23 as well as “The Google Financial Scorecard”.
  • Paperback suggested retail price is only $14.00

What’s bad about the book?

  • Somehow denoting new content would be nice for future editions.
  • The book seems to indicate Google’s executives own only one aircraft but, I’m pretty sure that number is a little higher.

The Google Story Updated Edition is a great book and a highly suggested “must read”!

*See the September archive for more.

**Disclosure: The book’s co-author Mark Malseed guest-blogged here before.

***When CNet reporter Elinor Mills used Google to research Eric Schmidt within public sources, Google’s response was to tell CNet they were now blacklisted from receiving Google communication for a year – due to privacy issues with Elinor’s report.

[By Brian Ussery | Origin: The Google Story, Updated for Google's 10th B ... | Comments]


[Advertisement] Want to advertise here? Your ad will show in the blog and feed.

September 29, 2008

An Investigation Into Communication Between NSA and Google

Filed under: Technology, Internet, Google, Search — Lindon @ 11:27 pm

A PDF file published at GovernmentAttic.org contains, according to its description, the “NSA [US National Security Agency] administrative processing file for FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] request for records on Google and contracts With Google”. I asked Seth Finkelstein of the Infothought blog about this set of documents. He only glanced it over but here’s what he’s making of it:

<<I don’t see any *particularly* deep meaning or implications in the file. It seems pretty dull. It’s a “Freedom Of Information Act” case file. The Freedom Of Information Act is a US law that allows people to request certain information from the US government. Journalists and activists typically make those requests. Sometimes those requests uncover interesting things, but sometimes they just yield boring bureaucratic documents.

Here’s what it’s about:

1) Journalist asks the NSA for ALL material about their connections with Google, under the Freedom Of Information Act.

2) NSA responds to journalist that it can tell the journalist that the NSA has bought some search appliances and a support contract from Google, and can send the journalist the contract documentation about buying those items.

This, frankly, strikes me as pretty dull.

3) Google (as a party affected by the request for documents) objects that the price for the search appliances and hourly consulting rate for the service contract and other details are proprietary business information and shouldn’t be made public.

See around page 22

4) Lots of discussion between the NSA document office and Google as to what specific items are public or private.

See around page 65

5) NSA sends journalist the contract, with redactions per #4 – for around two million dollars, NSA bought four Google search appliances, two-years replacement warranty on all of them, and 100 hours of consulting support.

See page 74 and on.

Ho-hum.

Maybe the deeper meaning and implication was that the only thing the NSA was willing to tell the journalist was that it had bought a few Google search appliances, and claimed everything else was classified and not to be released under the Freedom Of Information Act law.>>

[Thanks Anonymous!]

[By Philipp Lenssen | Origin: An Investigation Into Communication Between N ... | Comments]


[Advertisement] Want to advertise here? Your ad will show in the blog and feed.
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress